Detailed description:
- Added imports for JiraClient and jira_status utilities (post_status_comment, set_implementing_label, transition_tasks_to_in_progress)
- Implemented status comment posting with emoji format: ⚙️ Implementation starting for {repo_display}. Setting up workspace...
- Added forge:implementing label setting on feature ticket
- Added task ticket transitions to In Progress when task_keys are present
- Extracted repository name from owner/repo format with fallback to 'unknown repository'
- Ensured JiraClient is properly closed using try/finally block
- All Jira operations use await and don't block workflow (utility functions handle error suppression)

Key implementation decisions:
- Placed Jira updates immediately after workspace logging (line 141) before workspace creation
- Used try/finally to guarantee JiraClient cleanup even if errors occur
- Used state.get('task_keys', []) to safely handle missing task_keys
- Repo display extraction handles edge case where current_repo may not contain '/'

Closes: AISOS-639

Detailed description:
- Created tests/unit/workflow/utils/test_jira_status.py with 8 comprehensive test cases
- TestPostStatusComment class with 3 tests covering success, HTTP errors, and timeouts
- TestTransitionTasksToInProgress class with 3 tests covering success, partial failures, and unavailable transitions
- TestSetImplementingLabel class with 2 tests covering success and failure cases
- All tests use AsyncMock and MagicMock for JiraClient mocking
- Used pytest caplog fixture to verify logger messages and levels
- Verified error suppression and proper error message formatting
- Tests ensure partial failures don't block remaining operations
- Followed existing patterns from test_qa_summary.py

Closes: AISOS-640

Detailed description:
- Created test file /workspace/tests/unit/workflow/nodes/test_workspace_setup.py
- Implemented 5 comprehensive integration tests for workspace setup Jira interactions
- Test verifies status comments posted with correct format (⚙️ Implementation starting...)
- Test verifies forge:implementing label is set on feature ticket
- Test verifies all task tickets are transitioned to 'In Progress'
- Test verifies workflow continues gracefully on Jira API failures
- Test verifies edge case handling for missing repository names
- All tests use mocked JiraClient, WorkspaceManager, GitOperations, and GuardrailsLoader
- Tests follow existing patterns from test_jira_status.py and test_qa_handler.py
- All tests pass with pytest
- Code formatted with ruff and passes linting

Closes: AISOS-641

Detailed description:
- Added post_status_comment import to implementation.py
- Post start comment '🔨 Forge is implementing this task.' when task implementation begins
- Post completion comment '✅ Implementation complete. Running local code review before PR.' on success
- No completion comment posted on failure (raises exception before reaching comment code)
- Created comprehensive unit tests covering all 6 acceptance criteria
- Tests verify start/completion comments, failure handling, multiple task independence, and error suppression

Key files modified:
- src/forge/workflow/nodes/implementation.py: Added status comment calls at entry and success exit
- tests/unit/workflow/nodes/test_implementation.py: New test file with 5 test cases

Implementation decisions:
- Used existing JiraClient instance in try block for both comments
- Leveraged post_status_comment utility from AISOS-638 for error suppression
- Followed existing pattern from workspace_setup.py for consistency
- Comments posted to current_task_key retrieved from workflow state
- Error handling relies on utility function's built-in exception suppression

Closes: AISOS-643

…omments

Detailed description:
- Created comprehensive integration test suite for task implementation status comments (SC-002)
- Added /tests/integration/orchestrator/test_task_implementation_status.py with 10 test cases across 4 test classes
- Tests verify TS-003: Single task receives both start and completion comments with exact text
- Tests verify TS-013: Multiple tasks receive independent comments with proper task_key isolation (no cross-contamination)
- Tests verify failure scenarios: No completion comment when task implementation fails midway
- Tests verify error handling: Workflow continues when Jira comment posting fails
- Created /tests/integration/orchestrator/README.md documenting test structure and maintenance guidelines
- All tests use proper async mocking (AsyncMock) for JiraClient and ContainerRunner
- Tests verify exact comment text matches specification requirements
- Tests use pytest caplog fixture to verify error logging behavior

Key test patterns:
- Mock helpers provide consistent test fixtures
- Each test class focuses on specific acceptance criteria (TS-003, TS-013, failures, errors)
- Tests verify both positive cases (comments posted) and negative cases (no completion on failure)
- Task isolation verified by testing sequential implementations with independent mocks
- All tests documented with clear docstrings explaining what they verify

Closes: AISOS-644

…ntation

Detailed description:
- Created comprehensive unit tests that mock post_status_comment() utility function
- Added test_implementation_status_instrumentation.py with 11 test cases across 4 test classes
- Tests verify post_status_comment() called with correct task_key and message at start
- Tests verify post_status_comment() called with correct task_key and message at completion (success only)
- Tests verify post_status_comment() NOT called at completion when implementation fails
- Tests verify correct task_key used for each task in multi-task scenarios
- Tests verify edge cases: missing task_key and exception handling
- Tests provide pure unit test isolation by mocking the utility function directly
- All tests follow existing patterns from test_jira_status.py and test_implementation.py

Closes: AISOS-645

This commit adds local_review_pass_number field to track review iteration count:

- Added local_review_pass_number field to PRIntegrationState in base.py
- Initialized field to 1 in create_initial_feature_state and create_initial_bug_state
- Reset pass number to 1 when entering local_review phase in implementation.py
- Increment pass number after each fix attempt in local_reviewer.py
- Created comprehensive unit tests with 13 test cases covering:
  - Initialization to default value 1
  - Reset behavior when entering local_review phase
  - Increment behavior after fix attempts
  - Persistence across review iterations
  - Reset for new feature tickets
  - Edge cases (missing value, max attempts, success, exceptions)

All tests pass and existing state tests remain unaffected.

Closes: AISOS-646

Implemented posting of initial local code review status comment when first
review pass starts. This comment is posted only once at the beginning of the
local_review phase, before any issues are detected.

Changes made:
- Modified src/forge/workflow/nodes/local_reviewer.py to add status comment posting
  - Added imports for JiraClient and post_status_comment utility
  - Implemented comment posting when pass_number == 1 (first pass only)
  - Comment: '🔍 Running local code review on changes before creating PR.'
  - JiraClient managed with try/finally block for proper resource cleanup
  - Comment posted before max attempts check and container execution

- Created tests/unit/workflow/nodes/test_local_review_status_comment.py
  - 14 comprehensive unit tests across 5 test classes
  - Test coverage: first pass comment, no comment on subsequent passes,
    error handling, edge cases, and integration with review flow
  - Verifies comment posts only when pass_number == 1
  - Verifies no duplicates on retry within same feature's review phase
  - Verifies JiraClient lifecycle management and error handling

Key implementation decisions:
- Comment posts to feature ticket (ticket_key), not individual tasks
- Uses post_status_comment() utility from Epic 1 for error suppression
- Errors logged but do not block workflow execution
- Pass number tracking prevents duplicates on retries
- When feature re-enters local_review (new implementation), pass_number
  resets to 1 ensuring comment posts for new review cycles

Closes: AISOS-647

Implemented posting of fix pass status comments for subsequent review iterations
(pass > 1). Comment includes incrementing pass number to show review iteration count.

Changes Made:
- Modified src/forge/workflow/nodes/local_reviewer.py to post fix pass status comment when pass_number > 1
- Added comment posting logic with format: "🔧 Local review found issues, applying fixes (pass {n})."
- Comment posts to feature ticket before max attempts check and container execution
- JiraClient properly managed with try/finally block for resource cleanup
- Created tests/unit/workflow/nodes/test_local_review_fix_pass_comment.py with 14 comprehensive unit tests
- Test coverage: pass 2/3/5+ comments, no comment on first pass, error handling, call ordering, edge cases

Key Implementation Details:
- Comment posts only when local_review_pass_number > 1 (lines 56-67 in local_reviewer.py)
- Uses post_status_comment() utility which suppresses exceptions and logs warnings
- Pass number correctly increments via f-string interpolation (e.g., pass 2, 3, 4, 5+)
- Follows same pattern as initial comment posting (lines 44-54) for consistency
- Error handling ensures workflow continues even if comment posting fails

Test Coverage:
- 4 test classes with 14 test cases covering all acceptance criteria
- Tests verify correct pass number in message (2, 3, 5+)
- Tests verify no comment on first pass (pass_number == 1)
- Tests verify error handling and workflow continuation on failures
- Tests verify call ordering (before container execution, after workspace check)
- Tests verify correct ticket_key usage and pass number incrementing

Closes: AISOS-648

…omment logic

Detailed description:
- Created comprehensive test suite with 22 unit tests across 6 test classes
- Tests verify conditional comment posting based on pass_number (== 1 vs > 1)
- Tests verify correct pass number appears in comment text for passes 2, 3, 4, 5+
- Tests verify error handling and suppression (exceptions don't break workflow)
- Tests verify graceful handling when pass_number is unavailable/None/0
- Tests verify integration with review flow (call ordering, correct ticket key)
- All tests use proper mocking with AsyncMock/MagicMock and @pytest.mark.asyncio
- Follows existing test patterns from related test files

Key files added:
- tests/unit/workflow/nodes/test_local_review_status_comments_comprehensive.py

Closes: AISOS-649

Detailed description:
- Created comprehensive integration tests for local review status comment scenarios
- Implemented 9 test cases across 6 test classes covering all acceptance criteria
- Test class TestLocalReviewStatusCommentsTS004 verifies only initial comment posted when first pass finds no issues (TS-004)
- Test class TestLocalReviewStatusCommentsTS005 verifies initial + 3 fix comments posted for 3-pass scenario with correct numbering (TS-005)
- Test class TestLocalReviewStatusCommentsFivePlusPass verifies 5+ pass scenario posts all fix comments with correct incrementing numbers
- Test class TestLocalReviewPassNumberResetsBetweenFeatures verifies pass_number resets between features
- Test class TestLocalReviewPassNumberPersistsAcrossIterations verifies pass_number persists across iterations within same feature
- Test class TestLocalReviewErrorHandling verifies workflow continues when comment posting fails
- All tests use appropriate mocking (JiraClient, ContainerRunner, GitOperations) to avoid external API dependencies
- Tests verify exact comment text matches specification
- Tests verify pass_number tracking across iterations
- Updated README.md with test documentation and coverage checklist

Closes: AISOS-650

Implemented comprehensive defensive coding and error handling for pass number tracking in local code review:

**Key Changes:**
- Added _validate_pass_number() function to validate and sanitize pass_number values
- Wrapped pass_number access with error handling (try-except pattern via validation)
- Generic fallback comment posts when pass_number unavailable: "🔧 Local review found issues, applying fixes."
- Invalid pass_number values (negative, None, non-integer) detected and logged
- Workflow continues execution when pass tracking fails
- INFO-level logs show normal pass number increments
- WARNING-level logs show pass tracking failures with diagnostic information

**Files Modified:**
- src/forge/workflow/nodes/local_reviewer.py
  - Added _validate_pass_number() helper function with type and value validation
  - Wrapped pass_number retrieval with validation and defensive handling
  - Added INFO logging for normal pass transitions
  - Added WARNING logging for invalid/corrupted pass_number values
  - Added fallback to generic comment when pass_number is invalid

**Files Created:**
- tests/unit/workflow/nodes/test_local_review_pass_tracking_errors.py
  - 15 comprehensive unit tests across 5 test classes
  - Tests validation function, invalid values, workflow continuation, logging levels

**Testing:**
- Unit tests verify defensive handling behavior
- Tests cover None, negative, zero, string, float, and boolean values
- Tests verify workflow continues on pass tracking failures
- Tests verify correct INFO and WARNING logging

Closes: AISOS-651

…rkflow state

Detailed description:
- Enhanced PR creation logic to extract pr_number from GitHub API response with explicit logging
- Added debug logging for successful PR number extraction
- Added warning logging when PR number unavailable in API response (includes diagnostic info)
- Modified Jira remote link creation to handle missing PR number gracefully (uses generic 'Pull Request' label)
- Modified info logging to indicate when PR number is unavailable
- PR number already stored in workflow state as current_pr_number field (defined in PRIntegrationState)
- Workflow continues without errors when PR number is None/unavailable
- Created comprehensive unit tests with 11 test cases covering:
  - Successful PR number extraction and state storage
  - PR number used in Jira remote link and logging
  - Handling missing PR number without workflow failure
  - Warning and info logging for missing PR number
  - Generic label fallback for Jira remote link
  - Edge cases (PR number 0, missing URL, multiple PRs)

Key files modified:
- src/forge/workflow/nodes/pr_creation.py: Added PR number extraction logging and graceful handling
- tests/unit/workflow/nodes/test_pr_creation_pr_number.py: Added 11 unit tests across 3 test classes

Closes: AISOS-652

Implemented status comment posting when PR is created, including transition from forge:implementing to forge:ci-pending labels.

Changes made:
- Modified wait_for_ci_gate node to detect initial entry vs re-entry after fix
- Added status comment posting with PR number when available: "🚀 Pull request #{pr_number} created and submitted. Waiting for CI checks to complete."
- Added fallback message when PR number unavailable: "🚀 Pull request created and submitted. Waiting for CI checks to complete."
- Added remove_implementing_label() helper to remove forge:implementing label
- Added set_ci_pending_label() helper to set forge:ci-pending label
- All Jira operations suppress errors and log failures without blocking workflow
- Created comprehensive integration tests for TS-006 and TS-014

Key implementation details:
- Status updates only occur on initial entry (ci_fix_attempts == 0), not on re-entry
- JiraClient lifecycle properly managed with try/finally for resource cleanup
- Label transitions use set_workflow_label() to atomically update workflow state
- All error handling follows existing pattern with WARNING level logging

Closes: AISOS-653

This commit adds current_attempt and max_attempts fields to workflow state
for tracking CI fix attempt iterations.

Changes made:
- Added current_attempt and max_attempts fields to CIIntegrationState
- Initialized current_attempt to 0 and max_attempts from config in feature/bug states
- Updated CI evaluator to increment current_attempt before each fix attempt
- Added validation to prevent current_attempt exceeding max_attempts
- Reset current_attempt to 0 on CI success and workflow completion
- Created comprehensive unit tests with 15 test cases across 5 test classes

Key implementation details:
- current_attempt starts at 0 and increments before each CI fix attempt
- max_attempts populated from settings.ci_fix_max_retries at state creation
- Validation blocks attempts when current_attempt >= max_attempts
- Counter resets on success (CI pass) or completion (tasks complete)
- Tests verify initialization, increment (1,2,3), validation, and reset behavior

Closes: AISOS-654

Implemented status comment posting at the start of each CI fix attempt,
displaying current attempt and max attempts to provide visibility into
the CI fix retry process.

Changes Made:
- Modified src/forge/workflow/nodes/ci_evaluator.py to post status comment
  at start of attempt_ci_fix function
- Added import for post_status_comment utility from jira_status module
- Implemented comment posting with format: '🔧 CI checks failed. Analyzing
  failure and attempting fix ({current_attempt}/{max_attempts}).'
- Added edge case handling: when attempt values are unavailable, logs error
  at ERROR level and skips comment posting (workflow continues)
- Comment posts to feature ticket (ticket_key) before workspace setup
- JiraClient lifecycle properly managed with try/finally block

Test Coverage:
- Created comprehensive integration tests in test_ci_fix_attempt_status_comments.py
- Test class TestCIFixAttemptStatusCommentsTS007: Verifies TS-007 acceptance criteria
  - First attempt posts '1/{max_attempts}' format
  - Second attempt posts '2/{max_attempts}' format
  - Final attempt posts '{max_attempts}/{max_attempts}' format
  - Comment posted to feature ticket, not task tickets
- Test class TestCIFixAttemptCommentCounts: Verifies correct attempt counting
  - Multiple attempts show incrementing counts (1/3, 2/3, 3/3)
  - Different max_attempts values work correctly (e.g., 5)
- Test class TestCIFixAttemptEdgeCases: Verifies edge case handling
  - Missing current_attempt logs error and skips comment
  - Missing max_attempts logs error and skips comment
  - Workflow continues when both values missing
- Test class TestCIFixAttemptErrorHandling: Verifies error handling
  - Workflow continues when comment posting fails
  - JiraClient closed even when comment posting fails
  - No comment posted when ci_failed_checks is empty
- Updated tests/integration/orchestrator/README.md with comprehensive documentation

All acceptance criteria met:
✓ Comment posted to feature ticket at start of each CI fix attempt
✓ Message includes correct attempt count (e.g., '1/3', '2/3', '3/3')
✓ First attempt shows '1/{max_attempts}' format
✓ Final attempt shows '{max_attempts}/{max_attempts}' format
✓ Comment posting failures are logged and suppressed without blocking workflow
✓ Integration test TS-007 passes (CI fix attempts post comments with correct counts)

Closes: AISOS-655

…ions

Detailed description:
- Created tests/unit/workflow/test_pr_status_comments.py with 28 comprehensive unit tests
- Tests cover PR number extraction (valid, missing, malformed responses)
- Tests cover PR status comment posting with/without PR number
- Tests cover label removal (forge:implementing) success and failure cases
- Tests cover label addition (forge:ci-pending) success and failure cases
- Tests verify error suppression and logging for all label operations
- Tests verify workflow continues after comment/label failures
- All tests use @pytest.mark.asyncio and proper mocking patterns
- Tests follow existing patterns from test_pr_creation_status_comments.py

Closes: AISOS-656

Extended test_ci_attempt_tracking.py with comprehensive unit tests for CI fix
attempt status comment posting functionality.

Changes:
- Added 4 new test classes with 11 unit tests (388 new lines)
- TestCIFixAttemptCommentFormatting: tests comment format for attempts 1, 2, 3
- TestCIFixAttemptCommentEdgeCases: tests first (1/max) and final (max/max) edge cases
- TestCIFixAttemptCommentErrorHandling: tests error logging when attempt values missing
- TestCIFixAttemptWorkflowContinuation: tests workflow continues after comment failures
- All tests verify exact message format with attempt counts (e.g., '1/3', '2/3', '3/3')
- Tests verify ERROR level logging when current_attempt or max_attempts is None
- Tests verify JiraClient lifecycle management even on errors
- Tests use comprehensive mocking to isolate CI fix attempt logic

Acceptance Criteria Met:
✅ Unit tests cover attempt counter initialization and incrementation
✅ Unit tests cover max_attempts config population
✅ Unit tests cover CI attempt comment formatting for attempts 1, 2, 3
✅ Unit tests cover first and final attempt edge cases
✅ Unit tests verify error handling when attempt values unavailable
✅ Unit tests verify workflow continues after comment failures

Closes: AISOS-657

…tatus updates

Detailed description:
- Created new test directory tests/integration/workflow/ for consolidated workflow status update tests
- Implemented test_pr_ci_status_updates.py with comprehensive integration tests covering:
  - TS-006: PR creation posts comment with PR number and updates labels (4 tests)
  - TS-007: CI fix attempts post comments with correct attempt counts 1/3, 2/3, 3/3 (3 tests)
  - TS-014: Comment uses fallback text when PR number unavailable (2 tests)
  - Error handling for Jira API failures (3 tests)
- Total of 12 integration tests covering all acceptance criteria
- Tests use appropriate mocks for GitHub, Jira, and ContainerRunner APIs
- Tests verify end-to-end workflow behavior including comment posting, label transitions, and error suppression
- Created README.md documenting test coverage, mock strategy, and related tests
- All tests follow existing patterns from orchestrator integration tests
- Python syntax validation passed successfully

Key implementation decisions:
- Mock helpers: create_mock_jira_client(), create_mock_container_runner(), create_mock_github_client()
- Tests use create_initial_feature_state() for state creation
- Tests verify exact comment text matches specification
- Tests verify ForgeLabel enums used correctly for label transitions
- Tests verify workflow continues despite Jira failures (error suppression)

Closes: AISOS-658